PCA Modelling, Methods and Technology, March 8th 2012

Time and place

08.03.2012, 2.30PM - 3.30PM (Norwegian time)
GoToMeeting (see the meeting invitation for connection details)

Attendees:

Onno Paap, Ian Glendinning, Keith Willshaw, Manoj Dharwadkar, Hamazaki Geiza, Hans Teijgeler, Michael Wiedau, Mikhail Federov, Darius Kanga, Manfred Theissen, Anatoly Levenchuk (stand-in for Victor Agroskin), and Kari Anne Haaland Thorsen

Agenda:

1. Approval of agenda
2. Approval of MoM from last meeting
3. Update from the working session in Houston - Ian
4. Furhter work on the template alignment - Ian/Onno
   
   1. Suggested working group
5. Next meeting
6. A.O.B.

Minutes of Meetings

1. Approval of agenda

OK

2. Approval of MoM from last meeting

OK

3. Update from the workin session in Houston
Ian gave a walkthrough of the working session in Houston on the 27th of February. Two important things that we need to come to an agreement on are:

1. RDS ID requirements and usage specification
   As part of the JORD project a documents with regards to this has been created. The document (JORD ID Specification) is available from the JORD wiki: https://www.posccaesar.org/wiki/FiatechJord Members of the SIG are invited to give input and comments to the document.

2. Alignment of the three different approaches to templates
   Ian has created an XL-sheet including all the three different approaches (JORD, the Gellish patterns and the Teijgeler templates list).
   The document is available from the JORD wiki: https://www.posccaesar.org/wiki/FiatechJord in the zip-folder named: JORD Industrial Usage & Mapping Methodology
   
   

It was agreed to set up a working group to work on this. Hans Teijgeler has offered to spend some time doing some initial work on this. He will discuss his solutions with the working group and when the working group has come to an agreement they will present the result to the MMT as a whole for validation.

Members of the working group are, as of today: Ian Glendinning and Hans Teijgeler. If anyone else would like to participate in the work they can contact Ian, Hans and Kari Anne. BUT – we will in general keep the group small.

Anatoly also mentioned the mapping application available from the following link: http://techinvestlab.ru/TabLan

The discussion forum 15926.org is now up and running. Onno gave a walkthrough of it. Kari Anne will send out an invite to join.

4. Involvement of project managers from important projects
The following project was identified as important:

• JORD
• iRing
• Russian project (Onno/Victor to provide more information)
• Brazilian project (Nils to provide more information)
• PCA projects
• South Korea
• IIP PIF
• Woodside project
• ReportingHub

We should strive to involve the project manager of the aforementioned project in the MMT SIG

5. Project priority, Nils PCA
Project priority is decided by the following rules:
PCA MMT SIG suggests and recommends priority, and PCA TAB makes the final decision on what to prioritize.

Aligning the three different approaches to templates (JORD, Gellish and work done by Hans Teijgeler) was identified as the number one priority. This needs to be in place before we can proceed with any other projects. Identifying this at most important issue to solve, the regular MMT meeting was ended and we started a work session on this issue.

6. A.O.B.

N/A

Action Items