Version 16 (modified by hmottestad, 10 years ago)

--

PCA Modelling, Methods and Technology, September 26th 2013

Time and place

26.09.2013, 2.30PM - 3.30PM (CEST)
GoToMeeting (how to connect - need login)
Next meeting: October 24th 2013, 2.30-3.30PM CEST

Attendees

Agenda:

1. Approval of agenda

Approved

2. Approval of MoM from last meeting

Approved

3. Follow up on the updates to the RDL from the last meeting

RDL will update to align to the changed made to the old reference data system. See preliminary notice here: https://www.posccaesar.org/wiki/Rds/Update201309

4. Discussing the template review process

4.1. Selection of templates

There was a discussion and the templates that were selected were classification and description classification templates.

SELECTEDClassificationOfIndividualFor ApprovalCLASSIFICATIONA PossibleIndividual fulfils the criteria for membership of a (Part 2) ClassOfIndividualIN-CLSIF-01.xml
DescriptionOfIndividualDeprecatedDESCRIPTIONA PossibleIndividual is described with a string.IN-DESCR-01.xml
SELECTEDClassifiedDescriptionOfIndividualFor ApprovalDESCRIPTIONA PossibleIndividual is described according a given type of description.IN-DESCR-02.xml
DescriptionOfIndividualInLanguageDeprecatedDESCRIPTIONA PossibleIndividual is described with a string, expressed in a natural language.IN-DESCR-03.xml
SELECTEDClassifiedDescriptionOfIndividualInLanguageFor ApprovalDESCRIPTIONA PossibleIndividual is described with a string, expressed in a natural language, according a given type of description.IN-DESCR-04.xml
DescriptionOfIndividualWithSignDeprecatedDESCRIPTIONA PossibleIndividual is described with another PossibleIndividual that serves as a sign.IN-DESCR-05.xml
SELECTEDDescriptionOfIndividualWithClassifiedSignFor ApprovalDESCRIPTIONA PossibleIndividual is described with an individual that serves as a sign, according to a given Sign class (e.g. DIN 4844).IN-DESCR-06.xml

4.2. Requirements to the templates (proposal specification)

4.2.1. Technical

4.2.2. Textual (ie. descriptions, examples, justifications)

4.3. Requirements to supporting documentation

5. Execution of the review process

5.1. Creating proposal

5.2. How to organise hearing?

5.2.1. Send email? Upload on webpage? Who should be notified?

5.3. How to collect feedback using ISO comment form?

6. Discussing the goal of the review process

6.1. Who will use the templates?

6.2. How will they become available?

6.3. Ownership and licensing

7. A.O.B.

Review process slide:

Home
About PCA
Reference Data Services
Projects
Workgroups