Version 15 (modified by hmottestad, 11 years ago) |
---|
PCA Modelling, Methods and Technology, September 26th 2013
Time and place
26.09.2013, 2.30PM - 3.30PM (CEST)
GoToMeeting (how to connect - need login)
Next meeting: October 24th 2013, 2.30-3.30PM CEST
Attendees
Agenda:
1. Approval of agenda
Approved
2. Approval of MoM from last meeting
Approved
3. Follow up on the updates to the RDL from the last meeting
RDL will update to align to the changed made to the old reference data system. See preliminary notice here: https://www.posccaesar.org/wiki/Rds/Update201309
4. Discussing the template review process
4.1. Selection of templates
There was a discussion and the templates that were selected were classification and description classification templates.
SELECTED ClassificationOfIndividual For Approval CLASSIFICATION A PossibleIndividual fulfils the criteria for membership of a (Part 2) ClassOfIndividual IN-CLSIF-01.xml DescriptionOfIndividual Deprecated DESCRIPTION A PossibleIndividual is described with a string. IN-DESCR-01.xml SELECTED ClassifiedDescriptionOfIndividual For Approval DESCRIPTION A PossibleIndividual is described according a given type of description. IN-DESCR-02.xml DescriptionOfIndividualInLanguage Deprecated DESCRIPTION A PossibleIndividual is described with a string, expressed in a natural language. IN-DESCR-03.xml SELECTED ClassifiedDescriptionOfIndividualInLanguage For Approval DESCRIPTION A PossibleIndividual is described with a string, expressed in a natural language, according a given type of description. IN-DESCR-04.xml DescriptionOfIndividualWithSign Deprecated DESCRIPTION A PossibleIndividual is described with another PossibleIndividual that serves as a sign. IN-DESCR-05.xml SELECTED DescriptionOfIndividualWithClassifiedSign For Approval DESCRIPTION A PossibleIndividual is described with an individual that serves as a sign, according to a given Sign class (e.g. DIN 4844). IN-DESCR-06.xml
4.2. Requirements to the templates (proposal specification)
4.2.1. Technical
4.2.2. Textual (ie. descriptions, examples, justifications)
4.3. Requirements to supporting documentation
5. Execution of the review process
5.1. Creating proposal
5.2. How to organise hearing?
5.2.1. Send email? Upload on webpage? Who should be notified?
5.3. How to collect feedback using ISO comment form?
6. Discussing the goal of the review process
6.1. Who will use the templates?
6.2. How will they become available?
6.3. Ownership and licensing
7. A.O.B.
Review process slide: