Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of SigMmtMom230513
- Timestamp:
- 05/24/13 09:30:41 (11 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
SigMmtMom230513
v6 v7 27 27 28 28 '''3. Part 4 namespace, possible ISO/PCA agreement''' [[br]] 29 Maintenance of Part 4 is on the agenda for the Paris ISO-meeting. These plans will be useful input for what the MMT will propose. Nils and David Leal will also be present, which gives the possibilities to discuss other issues related to possible arrangements and future possible changes (ref action 13.10).29 Maintenance of Part 4 is on the agenda for the Paris ISO-meeting. These plans will be useful input for what the MMT will propose. Nils and David Leal will also be present, which gives the possibilities to discuss other issues related to possible arrangements and future possible changes. Lillian will therefore report back at the next meeting (ref action 13.10). 30 30 31 31 '''4. # and / uris ''' [[BR]] … … 40 40 - Minor comments on identification of templates (discussed in the Part 8 Implementation Workgroup): [http://15926.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=155] 41 41 - New thread on ISO 15926-4 objects dereferenceable, but not many comments yet [http://15926.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=157] 42 - The template set at 15926.org will by updated according to the JORD Id spec and consolidated with the IIP template set .42 - The template set at 15926.org will by updated according to the JORD Id spec and consolidated with the IIP template set 43 43 - Some new publications 44 44 … … 48 48 49 49 '''8. A.O.B''' [[br]] 50 Regarding dereferenceability; No good support services from PURL. The alternative is to manage an own purl server. Such a solution reqiures cooperation with ISO. An alternative approch could be to use a predicate instead. We will probably know more about the plans for Part 4 after the ISO meeting i Paris i June that hopefullewill give a better starting point for further recommendations.50 Regarding dereferenceability; Poor support services from PURL. The alternative is to manage an own purl server. Such a solution requires cooperation with ISO. An alternative approach could be to use a predicate instead. We will probably know more about the plans for Part 4 after the ISO meeting i Paris i June that hopefully will give a better starting point for further recommendations.