Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of SigMmtMom230513

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
05/23/13 21:12:07 (11 years ago)
Author:
lhella (IP: 80.202.81.210)
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • SigMmtMom230513

    v5 v6  
    4423.05.2013, 2.30PM - 3.30PM (CEST) [[BR]] !GoToMeeting ([wiki:SigMmt/Internal/MeetingConnect how to connect] - need login)[[BR]]  
    55Next meeting: June 27th 2013, 2.30-3.30PM CEST 
     6 
     7=== Attendees === 
     8Darius Kanga, Keith Willshaw, Victor Agroskin, Onno Paap, Kari Anne Haaland Thorsen, Michael Wiedau and Lillian Hella (MoM) 
     9 
    610 
    711=== Agenda: === 
     
    1418 1. PCA meetings and Semantic Days 
    1519 1. A.O.B. 
     20 
     21=== Minutes of Meeting === 
     22'''1. Approval of agenda''' [[br]] 
     23Approved. 
     24 
     25'''2. Approval of MoM from last meeting'''[[BR]]  
     26Approved. 
     27 
     28'''3. Part 4 namespace, possible ISO/PCA agreement''' [[br]] 
     29Maintenance of Part 4 is on the agenda for the Paris ISO-meeting. These plans will be useful input for what the MMT will propose. Nils and David Leal will also be present, which gives the possibilities to discuss other issues related to possible arrangements and future possible changes (ref action 13.10). 
     30 
     31'''4. # and / uris '''   [[BR]] 
     32See [http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/] [[BR]] 
     33Note the difference between hash and slash uris. When a client wants to retrieve a hash URI, then the HTTP protocol requires the fragment part to be stripped off before requesting the URI from the server. Hence there needs to be a slash uri for dereferencability. Hash identifiers works fine for smaller sets that are published. The PCA RDL is a big set and uses slash uris and will continue to do that supported with the linked data pages. If anyone has any views on uri scheme e.g. related to sandbox services, please provide your feedback. 
     34 
     35'''5. HEED and progress on change management ''' [[br]] 
     36The HEED project is working on a report on product life cycle stages and are currently working on how to model it (1. deep and 2. shallow modelling). They will let us know if they have something to share. 
     37[[br]]  
     38 
     39'''6. 15926.org forum update ''' [[br]] 
     40 - Minor comments on identification of templates (discussed in the Part 8 Implementation Workgroup): [http://15926.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=155] 
     41 - New thread on ISO 15926-4 objects dereferenceable, but not many comments yet  [http://15926.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=157] 
     42 - The template set at 15926.org will by updated according to the JORD Id spec and consolidated with the IIP template set. 
     43 - Some new publications 
     44 
     45'''7. PCA meetings and Semantic Days''' [[br]] 
     46See [http://semanticdays.no] [[BR]] 
     47Kari Anne, Michael and Lillian will attend. 
     48 
     49'''8. A.O.B''' [[br]] 
     50Regarding dereferenceability; No good support services from PURL. The alternative is to manage an own purl server. Such a solution reqiures cooperation with ISO. An alternative approch could be to use a predicate instead. We will probably know more about the plans for Part 4 after the ISO meeting i Paris i June that hopefulle will give a better starting point for further recommendations. 
Home
About PCA
Reference Data Services
Projects
Workgroups