Version 3 (modified by karianne, 12 years ago) |
---|
PCA Modelling, Methods and Technology, March 29th 2012
Time and place
7.06.2012, 2.30PM - 3.30PM (CEST))
GoToMeeting (see the meeting invitation for connection details)
Next meeting: 28.06.2012, 2.30PM - 3.30PM (CEST))
Attendees
Darius Kanga, Devesh Sachar, Hamazaki Geiza, Keith Willshaw, Magne Valen-Sendstad, Mikhail Fedorov, Onno Paap, Peter Denno, Scott Gracie, Victor Agroskin, and Kari Anne Haaland Thorsen (MoM)
Agenda:
- Approval of agenda
- Approval of MoM from last meeting
- Presentation of MMT Core Group And Deadlock group
- Clarification in way of working
- A.O.B.
Minutes of Meetings
1. Approval of agenda
OK
2. Approval of MoM from last meeting
OK
3. Presentation of MMT Core Group And Deadlock group
The members of the core group are as follow:
- Darius Kanga
- Geiza Hamazaki
- Hans Teijgeler
- Ian Glendinning*
- Kari Anne Haaland Thorsen
- Keith Willshaw*
- Magne Valen-Sendstad*
- Mikhail Federov
- Onno Paap*
- Pavel Selchukov*
- Rahul Patil
- Viktor Agroskin
The once with an asterisk next to their name are the members of the deadlock group.
a. Clarification in way of working
We experienced some problems with the recent votes on the 15926.org forum. The major issues were:
- The requirement to order the voting, i.e. vote for some issues before others.
- Some of the issues were not open for voting
- Some models proposed were too complex for a simple yes/no vote
It was proposed to break down the models to simpler part as follows:
Property Range Issue:
The discussion is to be locked. Onno will summarize the discussion, and start different topics to cover various branches of the discussion. Magne prefer to model this in part2 and part4, and Onno showed how The Oline Tools Template definitions allow for this.
Plant Lifecycle Model:
Two main issues were discussed:
- Modelling using Classes instead of individuals
- Modelling of Temporal Parts to Classes
Onno will split the proposals and lock the existing issue after discussion with Mange and Hans. This is to allow the group to discuss the matter farther.
Class Model:
This existing issue will also be locked and discussion renewed with a proposal aimed at coming up with a clear method of making a clear decision preferably using a flowchart.
Template model revisited:
In order to use Class Model new Templates would be requires. Hans wanted to summarize these changes. However, new ideas have evolved which instead of pointing at templates involves pointing at specialized classes using enumerated lists of classes. This will become decouples from the Plat Lifecycle Model.
Magne discussed necessity of deciding where you are in the 4-level architecture.
Onno, Hans, Ian and Magne are to meet 21/22nd of June to discuss these modelling issues further. The result of the meeting will be presented in our next meeting.
Subjects should be open for discussions at an adequate time for the core group to evaluate and comment. Preferably discussions should end with a consensus, but if that is not possible, Kari Anne will arrange for special deadlock meetings.
Kari Anne asked for feedback with regards to the core groups vacation plans. This was to avoid pulling of a vote at the middle of someone’s vacation.
4. A.O.B.
Action Items
Action 07.12 Send invitation to people suggested as members of the core group - Kari Anne (due date:
Action 08.12 Wrap up the lifecycle model and variant model for core group to review - Hans and Onno