Changes between Version 10 and Version 11 of RdsWipWorldView

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
09/02/08 21:19:16 (13 years ago)
Author:
jbourne (IP: 70.48.152.174)
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • RdsWipWorldView

    v10 v11  
    7474 
    7575---- 
    76  
    77 (@note embedded comments contain notes) 
    78  
    79 {{{ 
    80 #!comment 
    81  
    82 Paths to interop - automated translation. 
    83  
    84 Problems of automated translation, limitations of fidelity, violation of FOL. 
    85  
    86 What I think is important though, is that for the latter 
    87 the *cost* of translating peer to peer or peer to common, 
    88 by investing in definitional machinery that can then be 
    89 used to create a cheap, strong translation engine. 
    90  
    91 If we take the top-down approach and run it to its 
    92 conclusion right down at the FOL level on existing 
    93 templates we will certainly result in statements that 
    94 violate FOL. 
    95  
    96 99% of the definitions that will be imported into the WIP from 
    97 existing sources will have been arrived at through top-down 
    98 approaches, and 99% of those again will have no longhands to 
    99 start with.  I think the WIP should be a place people can put 
    100 things, and then collaboratively develop the longhands for them. 
    101  
    102 But we will very likely find that they are not logically consistent, 
    103 at least in a first order logic sense.  We need to accomodate that 
    104 reality. 
    105  
    106 }}} 
    107  
    108 ---- 
Home
About PCA
Reference Data Services (RDS)
RDS Operations Support
Meetings and Conferences
ISO 15926
Special Interest Groups
Technical Advisory Board
Norwegian Continental Shelf Std
Projects
Search