| 1 | {{{ |
| 2 | #!comment |
| 3 | NB! Make sure that you follow the guidelines: http://trac.posccaesar.org/wiki/IdsAdiEditing |
| 4 | }}} |
| 5 | |
| 6 | [[TracNav(TracNav/RdsWip)]] |
| 7 | [[Image(wiki:IdsAdiBranding:Logo-128x128.gif)]] |
| 8 | = POSC-Caesar FIATECH IDS-ADI Projects = |
| 9 | == Intelligent Data Sets Accelerating Deployment of ISO15926 == |
| 10 | == ''Realizing Open Information Interoperability'' == |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ---- |
| 13 | |
| 14 | = Thought and Language = |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Humans are not logical, humans think by making generalizations about observable patterns, and such generalizations need not be comprehensive; that is to say it is implicit that the generalizations are not intended to necessarily cover all cases. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Frequently, this means that humans hold to lore that while useful, might not be correct. But its usefulness extends beyond its value as an approximation, or a rule of thumb: it is useful because human languages makes it concise to communicate to other humans. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Fundamentally, patterns and generalizations are concise to communicate in human language because human language is based on the same principle - generalizations and analogies that are not intended to be either comprehensive in scope, or literal in application. For example: |
| 21 | |
| 22 | "The apple doesn't fall far from the tree ..." |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Humans will accept exceptions to rules, while maintaining that the rule still holds worth: |
| 25 | |
| 26 | "... but he was definitely the black sheep of the family." |
| 27 | |
| 28 | The same ''flexibility'' exists in all human languages and in almost all universes of discourse, short of some mathematics and philosophy - purely abstract universes that do not deal with the real world. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | Even physics, chemistry and especially biology and linguistics have shorthands that are universally used in spite of being rife with exceptions and addenda: newtonian physics and thermodynamics were the building blocks of 19th century engineering, and yet they only apply well within particular limitations of scale - demonstrably they are not useless, but neither are they "right". |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ---- |