Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of RdsWipUseCaseTwoGeneral

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
06/23/08 07:14:04 (16 years ago)
Author:
jbourne (IP: 70.54.77.119)
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • RdsWipUseCaseTwoGeneral

    v1 v2  
    22= RDS/WIP 2.0 General Use Cases = 
    33 
    4 @todo 
     4This is a quick page outlining the general use cases for the RDS/WIP 2.0, as simple sequences of typical events.  This is currently far from exhaustive - it should just give a sense of the flavours that are possible. 
    55 
     6== Add New Yellow Belt Editor == 
     7 
     8Addition of a new yellow belt editor to the RDS/WIP community. 
     9 
     10 * Yellow belt passes accreditation. 
     11 
     12 * IDS-ADI personnel use RDS/WIP Administrator UI to create new user credentials and authorize to 
     13   allowable RDS/WIP ISO 15926 datasets. 
     14 
     15 * Credentials are posted to yellow belt. 
     16 
     17 * Yellow belt can now login to server (HTTP-based authentication over SSL). 
     18 
     19== Publish ISO 15926 Definition by SPARQL/SOAP Client == 
     20 
     21Publish a set of new ISO 15926 conformant definition using a desktop application (or another service). 
     22 
     23 * Yellow belt creates definition in SPARQL/SOAP client s/w. 
     24 
     25 * Yellow belt posts definition via Web Service to RDS/WIP (authorization required). 
     26 
     27 * Content is immediately available to public via SPARQL and via web browser presentation layer. 
     28 
     29== Publish ISO 15926 Definition by Bulk Upload == 
     30 
     31Publish a set of new ISO 15926 conformant definitions using the bulk upload user interface. 
     32 
     33 * Yellow belt creates definition in OWL/RDF. 
     34 
     35 * Yellow belt uploads definition via Submittal UI to RDS/WIP (authorization required). 
     36 
     37 * Content is immediately available to public via SPARQL and via web browser presentation layer. 
     38 
     39== Publish ISO 15926 Definition by Discrete Editor == 
     40  
     41Publish a set of new ISO 15926 conformant definitions using the Yellow Belt (Discrete) Editor thin client. 
     42 
     43 * Yellow belt logs in to RDS/WIP site. 
     44 
     45 * Yellow belt creates and edits definition using Yellow Belt (Discrete) Editor in private dataset. 
     46 
     47 * Yellow belt may logout and return later, dataset remains valid and private, can continue to edit. 
     48 
     49 * Theoretically: could allow a yellow belt to share private dataset with other yellow belts. 
     50 
     51 * Yellow belt submits dataset - editor extracts OWL/RDF and adds to WIP using internal bulk 
     52   submittal process. 
     53 
     54 * Private data set is cleared, but left available (would retain permissions if multiple people could edit). 
     55 
     56 * Content is immediately available to public via SPARQL and via web browser presentation layer. 
     57 
     58== Publish and Maintain Ad-Hoc RDF == 
     59 
     60Publish and maintain an RDF dataset consisting of non-ISO 15926 definitions. 
     61 
     62 * Submitter creates RDF as a single document. 
     63 
     64 * Submitter passes RDF to IDS-ADI for consideration. 
     65 
     66 * IDS-ADI choose to create a dataset and upload using original RDS/WIP 1.0 triplestore manager. 
     67 
     68 * Local identifiers in the document will of course reflect the chosen endpoint automatically. 
     69 
     70 * IDS-ADI create new user for submitter and give user rights to dataset. 
     71 
     72 * User can now alter that data set themselves, and/or assign rights to other users. 
     73 
     74 * Note: cannot use discrete editor because its not ISO 15926 format.  Can use bulk upload UI and/or API. 
     75 
     76 * Theoretically: could form basis for harmonization effort - eg. might set up BIM team RDF repository. 
     77 
     78== Change Status of Submission == 
     79 
     80A Yellow Belt Modeler thinks that a submission is "standard" quality and should be elevated in status. 
     81 
     82 * Submitter uses Yellow Belt (Discrete) Editor to mark a submission for consideration of new status. 
     83 
     84 * Changed submission status is immediately reflected in public data. 
     85 
     86 * Yellow Belt notifies Black Belts of changed status (probably by email in 2.0, but automatable later). 
     87 
     88 * Black Belts search for submissions and alter status accordingly (might reject or accept). 
     89 
     90 * Black Belt notifies Yellow Belt of changed status. 
     91 
     92 * Changed status is immediately reflected in public data. 
     93 
     94 * Yellow Belt can search for submissions and check returned status. 
     95 
Home
About PCA
Reference Data Services
Projects
Workgroups