Changes between Version 13 and Version 14 of RdsWipOneProcess
- Timestamp:
- 11/20/08 16:25:33 (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
RdsWipOneProcess
v13 v14 89 89 == Publishing Detail == 90 90 91 @todo talk about the overall steps to publication 92 91 The publication process for the RDS/WIP 1.0 is as follows: 92 93 * coordinate with IDS-ADI to become a vetted submitter 94 * assemble and send a submission to an assessor 95 * await publication or change recommendation 96 97 While not ideal, this process is workable in the interim. For the RDS/WIP 2.0, it is anticipated that submitters will participate in a certification programme, rather than informal vetting, and there will be no manual assessment stage, simply automated publishing. 93 98 94 99 === Submitter Requirements === … … 101 106 102 107 ''The goal of this is to ensure that IDS-ADI as a group have collective faith that the submitter will participate in good faith and have an understanding of the level of process maturity and time constraints of assessor personnel. In short, IDS-ADI need to be convinced that the submitter will be a constructive, rather than destructive influence on the RDS/WIP in the nascent stage.'' 103 104 @todo what is the process for vetting a submitter - SC email discussion and email vote?105 108 106 109 ==== Access Credentials ==== … … 121 124 Syntactic form is negotiable. Supported forms are QMXF, QXF, RDF/XML, N3 or N-TRIPLE. 122 125 123 @todo is the preferred form QMXF?124 125 126 Character set encoding of any XML form (QMXF, QXF, RDF/XML) must be formally stated in the XML header, unless it is UTF-8 - this is consistent with XML processing rules, but is restated here for emphasis. 126 127 … … 138 139 139 140 Each submission item must provide a copyright statement that allows free use of the content and any implied patents. Copyright need not be transferred from the original party, however, anyone must be guaranteed free and unencumbered use of the information, with the exception of the responsibility to convey the copyright terms. 140 141 @todo provide a list of acceptable copyrights - see OSF - suggest BSD 2 clause.142 141 143 142 ==== Semantic Form ==== … … 148 147 * not be directly comparable to an existing entry. 149 148 150 === Recommended Process === 151 152 @todo QMXF -> QXF -> RDF -> IdGen -> triplestore 149 ==== Semantic Content ==== 150 151 A submission consists of a number of distinct items. These items may be of four basic types: 152 153 * class definition 154 * class qualification (subclass/specialization) 155 * template definition 156 * template qualification (subclass/specialization) 157 * license definition 158 * application of status to an item 159 160 Status application is restricted - a submitter must have permission to apply a status to an item within a given context, they may also have restricted permissions on which status they may apply within in a given context. 153 161 154 162 === Submission Format Options === … … 254 262 The intention at this stage is to produce RSS feeds for each new RDF identifier that appears in any of the IDS-ADI controlled SPARQL endpoints, so that anyone can monitor and observe changes in the content of the RDS/WIP. 255 263 256 The specific schema for this RSS has not yet been determined (@todo)257 or implemented (@todo).258 259 264 == Completed Action Points == 260 265 … … 294 299 build summaries, what the summary lifespan is (how long a summary statement covers), etc. etc. 295 300 301 === Submitter Vetting === 302 303 Talk to SC about plan to vett submitters. 304 305 === Preferred or Recommended Submission Format === 306 307 Is the preferred or recommended submission format QMXF? 308 296 309 ----
