Changes between Version 12 and Version 13 of RdsMaintenanceProcedureTest
- Timestamp:
- 02/05/14 10:43:54 (10 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
RdsMaintenanceProcedureTest
v12 v13 24 24 25 25 === Evaluation of the Change Request === 26 The CR is checked for completeness and consistency by the PCA RD Maintenance Team staff, and 26 The CR is checked for completeness and consistency by the PCA RD Maintenance Team staff, and the CR is given status identifier "'''''for evaluation'''''". This step includes ensuring that all mandatory administrative and meta-data entries are appropriately filled-in and that any necessary accompanying items are sufficient for evaluation. This check is fully automated. 27 27 28 If this initial check is satisfactory 28 If this initial check is satisfactory the Proposer is notified about the status update. When a CR has passed this initial check, the content will be uploaded to the PCA Development endpoint. If the CR is deemed not to be satisfactory, the Proposer is notified with the reason(s) for rejection. 29 29 30 30 If the quality of the information in the CR is satisfactory, the PCA RD Maintenance Team Staff sets the status of the Change Request to "'''''for validation'''''" and notifies the Proposer about status update. If the CR is deemed not to be satisfactory, the Proposer is notified with the reason(s) for rejection. … … 35 35 The PCA SIG Validation Team Responsible determines whether the Change Request (Work Package) is within the scope of the PCA RDL and valid for evaluation (or should be rejected). 36 36 37 For the validation to be satisfactory (valid) more than half (a simple majority) of the PCA SIG Validation Team members must approve the proposed updates. If the Proposer of a CR is a SIG, then a validation teammust be assigned by the PCA TAB. The team must consist of domain experts that has been part of developing the CR, external domain experts and ISO 15926 experts.37 For the validation to be satisfactory (valid) more than half (a simple majority) of the PCA SIG Validation Team members must approve the proposed updates. If the Proposer of a CR is a SIG, then a validation team must be assigned by the PCA TAB. The team must consist of domain experts that has been part of developing the CR, external domain experts and ISO 15926 experts. 38 38 39 39 === Resolution of the CR === … … 51 51 52 52 == Definition and clarification of terms == 53 ''Add definition of terms by modifying definitions in ISO ST_DBS N52 (Rev 1)''54 55 53 === Terms for general use === 56 54 * PCA