Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of ISO15926inOWL/OWL2/MoM/20120705
- Timestamp:
- 10/02/12 08:57:18 (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
ISO15926inOWL/OWL2/MoM/20120705
v2 v3 18 18 19 19 === Minutes of Meetings === 20 ''' 1. Short introduction of participants ''' 20 ''' 1. Short introduction of participants '''[[BR]] 21 21 Presentation of participants were given – name, company and relation to ISO 15926 for all. 22 22 23 ''' 2. Available information sources ''' 23 ''' 2. Available information sources '''[[BR]] 24 24 1. Existing OWL DL versions available from PCA web - https://www.posccaesar.org/wiki/ISO15926inOWL 25 25 1. The simplified representation in ISO 15926-8 https://www.posccaesar.org/browser/PCAmembersArea/standards/15926/008%20TS%20publication … … 28 28 Other existing sources of information where not suggested during the meeting, but can be considered later if others need to be added. The way of working will influence the relevance of information sources. 29 29 30 ''' 3. High level requirements and design choices ''' 30 ''' 3. High level requirements and design choices '''[[BR]] 31 31 See project description for more details: [https://www.posccaesar.org/svn/pub/ISO15926asOWL/20110923_ISO15926_OWL2_Native_V2.pdf] 32 32 33 33 Other requirements and design choices can be added later, but this is the starting point. Additional sources were not suggested during the meeting. 34 34 35 '''4. Discussion ''' 35 '''4. Discussion '''[[BR]] 36 36 Several topics were up for discussion and some clarifications where made. Topics discussed can be covered in more detail in future meetings; 37 * How to deal with informal objectives (e.g. that it should look simple and easy to work with) in addition to the formal ones? Can they be combined? We need to be able to describe complex relations, which does not conflict with existing part 7-9 .37 * How to deal with informal objectives (e.g. that it should look simple and easy to work with) in addition to the formal ones? Can they be combined? We need to be able to describe complex relations, which does not conflict with existing part 7-9 38 38 * ISO15926-2 and description logics are highlighted as necessary for tool support and need to be a baseline for the work. 39 39 * Should alignment/mapping to other upper ontologies be part of the project? DOLCE was mentioned as one basic formal ontology, and is an upper ontology that is acknowledged in the RDF community and could therefore be used as an ontological basis. Are there others that should be considered too?
