Version 2 (modified by gordonrachar, 14 years ago)

--

Interoperability and Integration

Status of this document: Working Draft

This document is open for feedback, please post questions and comments in the forum at the bottom of this page. You will need a login to post in the forum.


Contents

  1. Abstract
  2. Interoperability
  3. Integration
  4. Back

Abstract

[Enter abstract]


Interoperation and Integration are often (incorrectly) used as synonyms of each other. Of course they often come as a pair: to get interoperability, you need integration; If you want integration you need interoperability. But they are not the same thing.

Interoperability

Interoperability is the ability to connect and transport information between points of encapsulation. Integration Integration is the ability to create a relationship between two different bits of information. Integration is saying that “that information” is related to “that information”. DOES NOT MEAN YOU MERGE DATA. Merging is taking two representations and combine them into one representation. It is often done this way (and often incorrectly), but it is not required, or even necessarily desirable It is richer if you say: • Stuff over here – is related to – stuff over there

  • and, by the way, the relationship is of a certain type

Integration

... ...

Back


Discussion

You have no rights to see this discussion.

Home
About PCA
Reference Data Services
Projects
Workgroups